How Tendering Practices Differ Around the World: A Global Comparison (2026)
Tendering has become a fundamental mechanism for allocating public — and increasingly private — sector spending across the world. The principle is broadly consistent everywhere: a competitive, transparent process that levels the playing field for suppliers and helps buyers identify the best overall value. But how that principle is implemented — the regulatory frameworks, the thresholds, the procedures, and the platforms — varies significantly by country and region.
This guide compares tendering practices across the UK, the United States, the Middle East, and the European Union — covering the regulatory frameworks, processes, and practical considerations suppliers need to understand in each.
Tendering Practices in the UK
Regulatory framework
UK public procurement is governed by the Procurement Act 2023, which came into force in February 2025 — replacing the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and several other EU-derived regulations with a single UK framework. The Act introduced significant changes, including the competitive flexible procedure (giving buyers greater latitude to design procurement processes, including negotiation), mandatory pipeline notices giving suppliers up to twelve months’ advance visibility of planned procurements, a central debarment register, and enhanced transparency requirements throughout the procurement lifecycle.
Above-threshold contracts must be advertised on the Find a Tender service — the central digital platform that replaced the EU’s Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) for UK procurements following Brexit. As of January 2026, the central government threshold for goods and services is £139,688, with a higher threshold of £215,720 for sub-central authorities such as local councils, NHS trusts, and universities, and a substantially higher threshold for works contracts. Below-threshold opportunities are published on Contracts Finder for English contracting authorities, with devolved equivalents — Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales, and eTendersNI for Northern Ireland — serving their respective nations.
The process
Most above-threshold UK tenders follow a recognisable structure. Suppliers respond to a tender notice, with an initial selection stage — using a Selection Questionnaire (SQ), the term that has largely superseded the older PQQ terminology — assessing financial standing, technical capability, and exclusion grounds. Shortlisted suppliers receive an Invitation to Tender (ITT) or, under the competitive flexible procedure, a procurement process that may include negotiation or dialogue stages designed by the buyer. Submissions are evaluated by a panel against published criteria, and the contract is awarded to the bidder offering the Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) — the standard that replaced the previous Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) terminology under the Procurement Act 2023.
Scale of the market
Gross public sector procurement spending in the UK reached approximately £434 billion in 2024/25 — an increase of around 5% on the previous year. Procurement accounts for roughly a third of total public sector expenditure. The UK government maintains a target of spending £1 in every £3 with small and medium-sized enterprises — reflected in how framework lots and below-threshold opportunities are structured to remain accessible to SMEs.
Tendering Practices in the US
Regulatory framework
US federal procurement is governed primarily by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) — a substantial body of rules codified in Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, covering procurement by civilian federal agencies, the Department of Defense, and NASA. The stated core principles are competition, transparency, and non-discrimination. Beyond the federal level, individual states and municipalities operate their own procurement systems, often with materially different rules, thresholds, and platforms from the federal framework and from each other.
The process
For contracts likely to exceed $25,000, agencies must post notice on a government-wide point of entry — primarily the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) website. Agencies are generally required to post a notice of proposed contract action a minimum period before issuing a solicitation, and to provide a minimum response time once the solicitation is issued.
US federal procurement broadly distinguishes between sealed bidding — where suppliers respond to an Invitation for Bid (IFB) with a fixed-price bid evaluated primarily on price and basic responsiveness — and negotiated procurement, where suppliers respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP) against published evaluation criteria, and agencies may engage in discussions or negotiations with offerors before final award. This negotiation stage is a notable difference from the UK’s traditional approach, though the UK’s competitive flexible procedure under the Procurement Act 2023 has narrowed this gap.
Scale of the market and SME access
US federal contract spending is substantial — recent fiscal years have seen federal contract awards well in excess of $700 billion annually, with a significant proportion directed to small businesses through set-aside programmes and small business participation goals. The US federal government maintains specific small business contracting goals across multiple categories — including goals for women-owned, veteran-owned, and historically underutilised business zones — that have no direct equivalent in UK procurement, though the underlying objective of supporting SME access is shared.
Tendering Practices in the Middle East
Procurement practices across the Middle East vary significantly by country, reflecting different legal systems, levels of e-procurement maturity, and degrees of centralisation. There is no single regional framework comparable to the UK’s Procurement Act or the EU’s procurement directives — each country operates its own system, though common themes around transparency, local content requirements, and increasing digitisation appear across the region.
Saudi Arabia
The Government Tenders and Procurement Law (GTPL) sets out the framework for public procurement, with electronic procurement increasingly conducted through the Etimad platform. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 economic diversification programme has driven significant growth in procurement activity, particularly in construction, infrastructure, and technology — with increasing emphasis on local content and Saudi workforce participation requirements (Saudisation) as evaluation factors.
United Arab Emirates
Procurement in the UAE is decentralised — each emirate operates its own protocols and platforms. Dubai uses e-procurement platforms including Tejari, while Abu Dhabi and other emirates operate their own systems. Suppliers targeting the UAE market need to understand that a procurement approach that works in one emirate may not directly translate to another — both in terms of platform and in terms of local procurement culture and requirements.
Qatar
Government procurement is supervised by the Central Tenders Committee (CTC), operating under specific procurement regulations. Qatar’s procurement activity has been shaped significantly by major national infrastructure programmes, with continuing investment in development projects across multiple sectors.
Kuwait
Tenders are managed by the Central Agency for Public Tenders (CAPT), which operates under detailed legal guidelines governing the tendering process, evaluation, and award. Kuwait’s procurement system is generally regarded as more centralised and procedurally formal than some neighbouring markets.
Across the Middle East, common practical considerations for international suppliers include local partnership or agency requirements — many countries require or strongly favour a local partner or registered agent — language requirements (Arabic documentation is frequently mandatory alongside or instead of English), and longer typical timescales for both procurement processes and payment compared to UK norms.
Tendering Practices in the European Union
Regulatory framework
EU public procurement is governed by a set of procurement directives that apply across all member states, though each state transposes these directives into national law — meaning the underlying principles are harmonised while specific procedures, platforms, and thresholds vary by country. Above-threshold contracts across the EU are published on Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) — the EU-wide procurement portal that UK suppliers lost direct access to for publishing UK contracts following Brexit, but which UK suppliers can still access and bid through under the UK’s status as a signatory to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement.
The process
EU procurement procedures will be broadly familiar to UK suppliers — open and restricted procedures, competitive procedures with negotiation, and competitive dialogue all exist in EU procurement law in forms similar to their pre-Procurement Act 2023 UK equivalents. Evaluation is based on the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) standard — the terminology the UK has since moved away from under the Procurement Act 2023, though the underlying concept (assessing quality and price together rather than price alone) remains consistent across both systems.
What UK suppliers need to know
UK suppliers can still bid for EU public contracts as third-country suppliers under WTO Government Procurement Agreement rights — on the same terms as suppliers from other GPA signatory countries, though not necessarily on the same terms as EU member state suppliers, depending on the specific contract and member state. Language requirements, currency considerations (most EU contracts are priced in euros), and the need to understand both the EU-level directive and the specific member state’s national implementation are all practical considerations for UK suppliers pursuing EU opportunities.
What These Differences Mean for Suppliers
For suppliers operating — or considering operating — across multiple markets, understanding these differences is not academic. The terminology, the platforms, the typical timescales, and the cultural expectations around supplier engagement all differ. A bid writing approach that wins consistently in the UK will not automatically translate to success in the US, the Middle East, or the EU — not because the underlying disciplines of good bid writing differ, but because the procedural context within which those disciplines are applied differs significantly.
Suppliers expanding into new markets should invest time in understanding the specific regulatory framework, the relevant platforms, and any local partnership or content requirements before committing significant resource to a first bid in that market. Our guide to bid writing strategies for emerging industries covers some of the adaptability principles that apply when entering unfamiliar markets, even where the “emerging” element is geographic rather than technological.
Frequently Asked Questions About International Tendering
Can UK suppliers bid for contracts in any of these markets?
In most cases, yes — though specific requirements vary. EU contracts are accessible to UK suppliers under WTO GPA rights. US federal contracts are generally open to international suppliers for many categories, though certain defence and security-related procurements have nationality restrictions. Middle East markets often require or favour local partnership arrangements — making direct bidding without a local presence more challenging in practice, even where not formally prohibited.
Is the evaluation approach similar across these markets?
The underlying principle — evaluating quality and price together rather than price alone for most service and complex contracts — is broadly consistent across the UK, EU, and many other developed procurement systems, though the specific terminology differs (MAT in the UK post-2025, MEAT in the EU and pre-2025 UK). US sealed bidding is more price-focused by design, while US negotiated procurement resembles the quality-and-price evaluation approach more closely. Middle East evaluation approaches vary by country and can be less transparently documented than UK or EU equivalents.
What is the biggest practical difference for a UK supplier bidding internationally for the first time?
Platform and process familiarity is often the first practical hurdle — each market has its own portals, registration requirements, and submission formats that take time to learn. Beyond this, payment terms and timescales can differ significantly from the UK’s 30-day Prompt Payment Code standard — some markets have materially longer typical payment periods, which needs to be factored into cashflow planning before committing to international opportunities.
Bid Confidently Across International Markets
Together: The Hudson Collective supports suppliers bidding across 52 countries — bringing the disciplines of evidence-based, buyer-specific bid writing to every market while navigating the specific regulatory and cultural context each one requires. Our team holds an 87% win rate across all sectors, working with 3,500+ organisations.
Send us your opportunity and we will tell you exactly where we can give you the edge.
Tell us about your opportunity.
About the author: Written by Joshua Smith, a seasoned bid-writing expert with experience across the UK, Middle East and US, helping organisations secure the contracts they deserve through high-quality, competitive tender responses.